Blended learning has gone from being an interesting new hybrid of traditional and online courses to being an expected part of American education. When the Sloan Consortium last studied blended learning in 2007, it found “a lot of room for growth” in the market for blended courses. It found “consumer preference for online and blended delivery far exceeds reported experience,” indicating that demand was ahead of supply at that point.

Here’s a great resource: the Teaching Practices Inventory. It’s an inventory that lists and scores the extent to which research-based teaching practices are being used. It’s been developed for use in math and science courses, but researchers Carl Wieman and Sarah Gilbert suggest it can be used in engineering and social sciences courses, although they have not tested it there. I suspect it has an even wider application. Most of the items on the inventory are or could be practiced in most disciplines and programs.

A survey of undergraduate teaching faculty has identified a shift toward more learner-centered teaching practices and a corresponding move away from lectures and other teacher-centered styles.

A recent experience in class left me a bit rattled, and made me wonder if I’ve long been trying to teach an impossible skill. It confronted me with a fundamental question: What’s teachable, and what do students simply have to figure out on their own with the passage of time?

Upcoming Live Online Seminars

Evidence-Based Teaching in Higher Education: Strategies to Improve Student Learning

Principles of Effective College Teaching

What are 20-Minute Mentors?
Magna 20-Minute Mentors are brief, tightly focused programs designed to help you tackle your trickiest teaching challenges. Our highly respected presenters give you the "here's how" advice that you can start using right away. Each session lasts for just 20 minutes—long enough to deliver actionable insights, but short enough to fit anyone's schedule.