I do a lot of presentations in August and September. Often my contributions are part of a larger set of activities that launch the new academic year. Frequently they include presentations during which faculty from that institution share instructional experiences, strategies, ideas, insights, and opinions. Once again this year, I have been impressed by the keen way faculty listen and learn from each other. Those in the sessions take notes, ask questions, and share their own experiences and ideas. Not only do faculty learn from each other, it’s obvious that they find these exchanges motivating and energizing. I also think there is a bit of relief that comes from knowing that students’ cell phones go off in other courses, that they miss deadlines, and offer lame excuses to other instructors.
Read more ›CURRENT ARTICLE • October 02
OTHER RECENT ARTICLES
As this example illustrates, scholarship doesn't always have to take the form of articles in refereed journals and sometimes when the scholarship is pedagogical, other formats make very good sense.
Read More ›Here’s an idea of that could benefit every discipline. A couple of psychology faculty members surveyed job ads posted by their professional association to identify which courses new faculty were most often asked to teach. They identified four courses, listed in 45 percent of the ads. Their point: graduate schools ought to be sure that their students are prepared to teach these courses.
Read More ›The September 4 blog offers criteria for assessing the contributions of individual students when they work on group projects.
Read More ›“Truly awful teaching in higher education is most often revealed by a sheer lack of interest in and compassion for students and student learning. It repeatedly displays the classic symptom of making a subject seem more demanding than it actually is. Some people may get pleasure from this kind of masquerade. They are teaching very badly if they do. Good teaching is nothing to do with making things hard. It is nothing to with frightening students. It is everything to do with benevolence and humility; it always tries to help students feel that a subject can be mastered; it encourages them to try things out for themselves and succeed at something quickly.” (p. 98)
Read More ›Here’s a guest blog written by Keith Starcher who teaches at Indiana Wesleyan University.
Read More ›I’m currently writing and thinking about ways to change faculty thinking about student evaluation. We need a whole new paradigm—one that gets teachers focused on improving student learning and pursues better teaching as a byproduct of that first endeavor. Teaching will still improve but the focus on learning changes some other important dynamics. It means that students are much more likely to become collaborators, allies in a shared endeavor.
Read More ›Writing about his maturation as a teacher, Kent Sandstrom (in one of my all time favorite articles) describes how he began his teaching career with such ambitious and lofty goals. In the tradition of Dewey he aspired to educate citizens for lives of social activity and responsibility.
Read More ›Need a good list of behaviors that students can assess when they work with each other in small groups? Diane Baker, in an excellent article on peer assessment in small groups (I’ll be excerpting more from it in an upcoming issue of the newsletter), reviewed a wide collection of instruments and found that although the number of items varied, most included some iteration of these eight behavioral components.
Read More ›There’s a new study published in a recent issue of Teaching of Psychology which lists seven other studies, and I know of several others not referenced there as well as a number of anecdotal accounts we’ve published in The Teaching Professor. Findings as to the benefits of this particular approach are definitely mixed. This recent Teaching of Psychology study found that when students expected to use their crib sheets but then were not allowed to, they performed significantly less well than when they used crib sheets. This finding caused these two researchers to conclude that “constructing crib sheets did not enhance learning.” (p.117)